Skip to main content

What is wrong with animal testing for cosmetics?

What is wrong with animal testing for cosmetics?

These tests can result in immense pain, distress, blindness, swollen eyes, sore and bleeding skin, internal bleeding, organ damage, birth defects, convulsions and even death in the animals. However, there are scientists who back animal testing for cosmetics.

Is animal testing for cosmetics effective?

Studies have proven that animal testing correctly predicts human reaction to cosmetics only 40 to 60% of the time, while alternatives are accurate 80% of the time.

What percentage of animal testing is for cosmetics?

Of the 50 largest cosmetics companies ranked by market value as per Brand Finance in 2021, we found that 88% fund animal testing.

What are the negative effects of animal testing?

The use of nonpredictive animal experiments can cause human suffering in at least two ways: (1) by producing misleading safety and efficacy data and (2) by causing potential abandonment of useful medical treatments and misdirecting resources away from more effective testing methods.

How many animals are killed by cosmetic testing?

Animal testing for cosmetics It is estimated that 100,000-200,000 animals suffer and die for cosmetics every year around the world. Animals tested for cosmetics are rabbits, guinea pigs, hamsters, rats and mice.

Why animal testing for cosmetics should be banned?

Testing cosmetics on animals is both cruel and unnecessary because companies can already create innovative products using thousands of ingredients that have a history of safe use and do not require any additional testing.

What are the positive effects of animal testing?

Animals themselves benefit from the results of animal testing. Vaccines tested on animals have saved millions of animals that would otherwise have died from rabies, distemper, feline leukemia, infectious hepatitis virus, tetanus, anthrax, and canine parvo virus.

Do animals survive animal testing?

As it turns out, the vast majority of animals – 97 percent – are killed at the end of experimentation. Just a small fraction of animals, 6,286 in total, were returned to nature or to their habitat.

What are pros of animal testing?

Testing on animals has saved and improved millions of lives. Animal testing has benefited researchers in understanding how to treat and prevent various conditions such as high blood pressure, diabetes, tuberculosis, poliomyelitis, muscular dystrophy, and Parkinson’s disease.

What are some cons for animal testing?


  • Animal testing is cruel and inhumane.
  • Scientists are able to test vaccines on humans volunteers.
  • Alternative testing methods now exist that can replace the need for animals.
  • Animals are very different from human beings and therefore make poor test subjects.
  • Drugs that pass animal tests are not necessarily safe.

What are the benefits of testing makeup on animals?

Advantages of Cosmetic Animal Testing Protecting the health of humans – Companies claim that protecting the health and safety of humans is the reason for cosmetic testing on animals. The tests performed will confirm the safety of the products.

Why do cosmetics companies test on animals?

This change drove the widespread use of animal testing by cosmetics companies. The Draize irritancy tests, which expose the eyes and/or skin of subject animals to harsh chemicals, were developed in 1944 and quickly became the gold standard for the safety testing of cosmetics. In 1980, campaigners successfully ended Revlon’s use of Draize testing.

What is the European Union doing about animal testing?

The European Union introduced a ban on the testing of finished cosmetic products (shampoo, make-up, toothpaste, etc.) on animals in 2004. Five years later, it also ended the testing of ingredients, following this up with a ban on the import and sale of new cosmetics tested on animals abroad, in 2013.

When did the EU stop testing cosmetics on animals?

The big breakthrough came in 2004, when – thanks to the 20-year campaign we led in Europe – the European Union introduced a ban on the testing of finished cosmetic products on animals. Five years later, it also ended the testing of ingredients, following this up with a ban on the import and sale of new cosmetics tested on animals abroad in 2013.

Does the FD&C Act require animal testing for cosmetics?

The FD&C Act does not specifically require the use of animals in testing cosmetics for safety, nor does the Act subject cosmetics to FDA premarket approval. However, the agency has consistently advised cosmetic manufacturers to employ whatever testing is appropriate and effective for substantiating the safety of their products.